↓ Skip to main content

Stochastic Swift-Hohenberg Equation with Degenerate Linear Multiplicative Noise

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions
Title
Stochastic Swift-Hohenberg Equation with Degenerate Linear Multiplicative Noise
Published in
Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00021-018-0368-3
Authors

Marco Hernández, Kiah Wah Ong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2018.
All research outputs
#18,591,506
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics
#133
of 359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,797
of 359,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 359 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.