↓ Skip to main content

Food habits of sika deer in the Shiranuka Hills, eastern Hokkaido: a northern example from the north–south variations in food habits in sika deer

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Research, December 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Food habits of sika deer in the Shiranuka Hills, eastern Hokkaido: a northern example from the north–south variations in food habits in sika deer
Published in
Ecological Research, December 2004
DOI 10.1007/s11284-004-0019-4
Authors

Ahimsa Campos‐Arceiz, Seiki Takatsuki

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 8 23%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 40%
Environmental Science 12 34%
Computer Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unknown 7 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,548,107
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Research
#241
of 887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,436
of 141,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Research
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 887 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.