↓ Skip to main content

Branch and bound, integer, and non-integer programming

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Operations Research, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Branch and bound, integer, and non-integer programming
Published in
Annals of Operations Research, December 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10479-006-0112-x
Authors

J. J. H. Forrest, J. A. Tomlin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 4%
Denmark 1 4%
Unknown 25 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Professor 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Other 6 22%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 8 30%
Engineering 6 22%
Computer Science 5 19%
Mathematics 3 11%
Energy 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,548,107
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Operations Research
#110
of 728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,786
of 156,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Operations Research
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 728 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.