| Title |
Immunogold labeling in scanning electron microscopy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Histochemistry and Cell Biology, July 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02473200 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. Hermann, P. Walther, M. Müller |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Slovakia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 22% |
| Researcher | 15 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2017.
All research outputs
#5,117,194
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#114
of 926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,828
of 30,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 926 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.