| Title |
Modeling diameter distributions in radiata pine plantations in Spain with existing countrywide LiDAR data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Forest Science , March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13595-018-0712-z |
| Authors |
Manuel Arias-Rodil, Ulises Diéguez-Aranda, Juan Gabriel Álvarez-González, César Pérez-Cruzado, Fernando Castedo-Dorado, Eduardo González-Ferreiro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 17% |
| Unknown | 6 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 20% |
| Engineering | 5 | 14% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2018.
All research outputs
#3,899,614
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Forest Science
#265
of 1,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,220
of 355,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Forest Science
#22
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.