You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Making sense of change: patients’ views of diabetes and GP‐led integrated diabetes care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Expectations, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1111/hex.12331 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Letitia H Burridge, Michele M Foster, Maria Donald, Jianzhen Zhang, Anthony W Russell, Claire L Jackson |
| Abstract |
Health system reform is directed towards better management of diabetes. However, change can be difficult, and patients' perspectives are a key aspect of implementing change. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 169 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 13% |
| Researcher | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 37 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 12% |
| Psychology | 15 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Unknown | 45 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2015.
All research outputs
#16,691,248
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Health Expectations
#1,361
of 1,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,382
of 362,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Expectations
#27
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.