↓ Skip to main content

Geospatial analysis requires a different way of thinking: the problem of spatial heterogeneity

Overview of attention for article published in GeoJournal, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
Geospatial analysis requires a different way of thinking: the problem of spatial heterogeneity
Published in
GeoJournal, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10708-014-9537-y
Authors

Bin Jiang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 117 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 20%
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Professor 5 4%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 23 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 18 15%
Computer Science 17 14%
Social Sciences 16 13%
Environmental Science 9 7%
Engineering 6 5%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 30 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,158,482
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from GeoJournal
#78
of 738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,928
of 308,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GeoJournal
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.