↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma Radiosensitivity using Synchrotron Microbeam Radiotherapy and Conventional Radiation Therapy In Vitro

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Research, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterization of Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma Radiosensitivity using Synchrotron Microbeam Radiotherapy and Conventional Radiation Therapy In Vitro
Published in
Radiation Research, November 2017
DOI 10.1667/rr4633.1
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. M. Smyth, P. A. W. Rogers, J. C. Crosbie, J. F. Donoghue

Abstract

Synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy is a promising preclinical radiotherapy modality that has been proposed as an alternative to conventional radiation therapy for diseases such as diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG), a devastating pediatric tumor of the brainstem. The primary goal of this study was to characterize and compare the radiosensitivity of two DIPG cell lines (SF7761 and JHH-DIPG-1) to microbeam and conventional radiation. We hypothesized that these DIPG cell lines would exhibit differential responses to each radiation modality. Single cell suspensions were exposed to microbeam (112, 250, 560, 1,180 Gy peak dose) or conventional (2, 4, 6 and 8 Gy) radiation to produce clonogenic cell-survival curves. Apoptosis induction and the cell cycle were also analyzed five days postirradiation using flow cytometry. JHH-DIPG-1 cells displayed greater radioresistance than SF7761 to both microbeam and conventional radiation, with higher colony formation and increased accumulation of G2/M-phase cells. Apoptosis was significantly increased in SF7761 cells compared to JHH-DIPG-1 after microbeam irradiation, demonstrating cell-line specific differential radiosensitivity to microbeam radiation. Additionally, biologically equivalent doses to microbeam and conventional radiation were calculated based on clonogenic survival, furthering our understanding of the response of cancer cells to these two radiotherapy modalities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 29%
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 3 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Research
#2,446
of 2,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#385,038
of 445,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Research
#17
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.