↓ Skip to main content

Localization and phosphorylation of HP1 proteins during the cell cycle in mammalian cells

Overview of attention for article published in Chromosoma, August 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
295 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Localization and phosphorylation of HP1 proteins during the cell cycle in mammalian cells
Published in
Chromosoma, August 1999
DOI 10.1007/s004120050372
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elsa Minc, Yves Allory, Howard J. Worman, Jean-Claude Courvalin, Brigitte Buendia

Abstract

Mammalian heterochromatin proteins 1 (HP1alpha, HP1beta, and HP1gamma) are nonhistone proteins that interact in vitro with a set of proteins that play a role in chromatin silencing, transcription, and chromatin remodeling. Using antibodies specific for each HP1 isoform, we showed that they segregate in distinct nuclear domains of human HeLa cells. By contrast, in mouse 3T3 interphase cells, HP1alpha and HP1beta are strictly colocalized. In mitotic HeLa cells, all of HP1alpha and a fraction of HP1beta and HP1gamma remain associated with chromosomes. Immunostaining of spread HeLa chromosomes showed that HP1alpha is mainly localized on centromeres as shown previously for HP1beta, while HP1gamma is distributed on discrete sites on the arms of chromosomes. Biochemical analysis showed that HP1alpha and HP1gamma are phosphorylated throughout the cell cycle, although more extensively in mitosis than in interphase, while HP1beta apparently remains unphosphorylated. Therefore, despite their extensive sequence conservation, mammalian HP1 isoforms differ widely in their nuclear localization, mitotic distribution and cell cycle-related phosphorylation. Thus, subtle differences in primary sequence and in posttranslational modifications may promote their targeting at different chromatin sites, generating pleiotropic effects.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Japan 3 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 133 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 32%
Researcher 31 22%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Master 14 10%
Professor 6 4%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 13 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Chemistry 4 3%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 15 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2023.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Chromosoma
#86
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,289
of 34,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chromosoma
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them