↓ Skip to main content

Infanticide by resident males and female counter-strategies in wild Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata)

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, August 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
Title
Infanticide by resident males and female counter-strategies in wild Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata)
Published in
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, August 2000
DOI 10.1007/s002650000224
Authors

J. Soltis, R. Thomsen, K. Matsubayashi, O. Takenaka

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 3%
United Kingdom 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 130 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 20%
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Bachelor 21 15%
Lecturer 6 4%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 10 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 91 65%
Psychology 7 5%
Environmental Science 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Arts and Humanities 5 4%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 14 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#1,459
of 3,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,802
of 38,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.