↓ Skip to main content

The evolution of arthropod heads: reconciling morphological, developmental and palaeontological evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Development Genes and Evolution, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 495)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
13 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
245 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The evolution of arthropod heads: reconciling morphological, developmental and palaeontological evidence
Published in
Development Genes and Evolution, June 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00427-006-0085-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerhard Scholtz, Gregory D. Edgecombe

Abstract

Understanding the head is one of the great challenges in the fields of comparative anatomy, developmental biology, and palaeontology of arthropods. Numerous conflicting views and interpretations are based on an enormous variety of descriptive and experimental approaches. The interpretation of the head influences views on phylogenetic relationships within the Arthropoda as well as outgroup relationships. Here, we review current hypotheses about head segmentation and the nature of head structures from various perspectives, which we try to combine to gain a deeper understanding of the arthropod head. Though discussion about arthropod heads shows some progress, unquestioned concepts (e.g., a presegmental acron) are still a source of bias. Several interpretations are no longer tenable based on recent results from comparative molecular developmental studies, improved morphological investigations, and new fossils. Current data indicate that the anterior arthropod head comprises three elements: the protocerebral/ocular region, the deutocerebral/antennal/cheliceral segment, and the tritocerebral/pedipalpal/second antennal/intercalary segment. The labrum and the mouth are part of the protocerebral/ocular region. Whether the labrum derives from a former pair of limbs remains an open question, but a majority of data support its broad homology across the Euarthropoda. From the alignment of head segments between onychophorans and euarthropods, we develop the concept of "primary" and "secondary antennae" in Recent and fossil arthropods, posit that "primary antennae" are retained in some fossil euarthropods below the crown group level, and propose that Trilobita are stem lineage representatives of the Mandibulata.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 3%
Germany 5 2%
Argentina 4 2%
Brazil 4 2%
United States 4 2%
Mexico 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 188 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 55 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 20%
Student > Bachelor 26 12%
Student > Master 21 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 7%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 23 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 131 60%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 23 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 6%
Environmental Science 9 4%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 33 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2022.
All research outputs
#676,621
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Development Genes and Evolution
#2
of 495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#897
of 65,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Development Genes and Evolution
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 495 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them