↓ Skip to main content

Giant spiny-frog (Paa spinosa) from different populations differ in thermal preference but not in thermal tolerance

Overview of attention for article published in Aquatic Ecology, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Giant spiny-frog (Paa spinosa) from different populations differ in thermal preference but not in thermal tolerance
Published in
Aquatic Ecology, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10452-009-9310-3
Authors

Rong-Quan Zheng, Chun-Tao Liu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
India 1 2%
Unknown 39 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 22%
Student > Bachelor 8 20%
Student > Master 7 17%
Other 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 61%
Environmental Science 5 12%
Unspecified 1 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 5 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,571,329
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Aquatic Ecology
#92
of 518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,100
of 165,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquatic Ecology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 518 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them