↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Seasonal Folivory and Frugivory on Ranging Patterns in Rhinopithecus roxellana

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Primatology, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Effects of Seasonal Folivory and Frugivory on Ranging Patterns in Rhinopithecus roxellana
Published in
International Journal of Primatology, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10764-010-9416-4
Authors

Yankuo Li, Zhigang Jiang, Chunwang Li, Cyril C. Grueter

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Japan 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 83 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 23%
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Master 15 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 5 6%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 62%
Environmental Science 8 9%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Unspecified 3 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 12 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Primatology
#550
of 1,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,013
of 95,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Primatology
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.