| Title |
Myology of the Feeding Apparatus of Myrmecophagid Anteaters (Xenarthra: Myrmecophagidae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Mammalian Evolution, June 1997
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1027366129277 |
| Authors |
Karen Zich Reiss |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 19% |
| Unknown | 5 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 60% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mammalian Evolution
#289
of 508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,449
of 29,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mammalian Evolution
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.