| Title |
Redescription de trois espèces de Calyptrobothrium Monticelli, 1893 (Tetraphyllidea: Phyllobothriidae) parasites de Torpedo marmorata et T. nobiliana (Elasmobranchii: Torpedinidae). Remarques sur leur spécificité parasitaire et sur la position taxonomique des espèces auparavant attribuées à C. riggii Monticelli, 1893
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Parasitology, May 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11230-006-9088-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fadila Tazerouti, Louis Euzet, Nadia Kechemir-Issad |
| Abstract |
A study of the cestodes from the intestinal parasites of torpedinid elasmobranchs off the coast of Algeria, revealed the presence, in Torpedo marmorata Risso, of a species of Calyptrobothrium Monticelli, 1893, which we believe is identical to C. riggii Monticelli, 1893. This species, which has not been re-examined since its original description, is redescribed. We consider that the cestode from T. marmorata, described by Zschokke (1888) under the name of Tetrabothrium longicolle Molin, 1858, is conspecific with C.riggii. In Torpedo nobiliana Bonaparte, from the Mediterranean, we found C. occidentale Linton, 1900 and C. minus Linton, 1907. These two species are redescribed based on the type-material from the North American Atlantic coast, as well as from specimens collected off Sète and Algeria. We place several specimens, previously identified as C. riggii, as conspecific with C. minus. An amended diagnosis for Calyptrobothrium is proposed. We discuss the attribution of Bilocularia hyperapolytica Obersteiner, 1914 from Centrophorus granulosus (Centrophoridae) to Calyptrobothrium. C. chalarosomum Alexander, 1963 from Cephaloscyllium isabellum (Scylliorhinidae) off New-Zealand is excluded from the genus and placed close to Crossobothrium Linton, 1889. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 25% |
| Other | 1 | 25% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,541,115
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Parasitology
#150
of 732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,158
of 71,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Parasitology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 732 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them