↓ Skip to main content

Bill Wimsatt on Multiple Ways of Getting at the Complexity of Nature

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Theory, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Bill Wimsatt on Multiple Ways of Getting at the Complexity of Nature
Published in
Biological Theory, April 2015
DOI 10.1162/biot.2006.1.2.213
Authors

William Bechtel, Werner Callebaut, James R. Griesemer, Jeffrey C. Schank

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 10%
Canada 1 10%
Unknown 8 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Other 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Student > Master 2 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 8 80%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,976,997
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Biological Theory
#174
of 313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,876
of 267,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Theory
#17
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.