| Title |
Amphisbaenians from the European Eocene: a biogeographical review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12549-012-0104-6 |
| Authors |
Marc Louis Augé |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Puerto Rico | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 29% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 43% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 36% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2016.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments
#121
of 323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,741
of 172,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.