↓ Skip to main content

Comparative pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of two oral formulations of thiocolchicoside, a GABA-mimetic muscle relaxant drug, in normal volunteers

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, December 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 423)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Comparative pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of two oral formulations of thiocolchicoside, a GABA-mimetic muscle relaxant drug, in normal volunteers
Published in
European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, December 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf03190249
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Perucca, P. Poitou, G. Pifferi

Abstract

The comparative pharmacokinetic and bioavailability profile of two different formulations (tablets and capsules) of thiocolchicoside was investigated in 8 healthy male volunteers after administration of single oral 8 mg doses. Plasma samples were assayed by a capillary gas chromatography--mass spectrometry (GC-MS) method following enzymatic hydrolysis of thiocolchicoside to its aglycone (3-demethylthiocolchicine) and no attempt was made to account for the possible occurrence of hydrolysis in vivo. Irrespective of the formulation used, the drug was rapidly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, peak levels of about 17 ng/ml being detected within 1 h in most subjects. Elimination was rapid, with mean MRT values of 5-6 h. All kinetic parameters showed considerable interindividual variability but none differed significantly between the two formulations. Relative to the tablet formulation, the oral bioavailability of the capsule formulation was 1.06 +/- 0.39.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 20%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 30%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 10%
Chemistry 1 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,272,274
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics
#22
of 423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,462
of 78,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 423 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them