↓ Skip to main content

Enantioselektive Cyclopropanierung von 1,1-Diphenylethylen und Diazoessigester mit Kupfer-Katalysatoren

Overview of attention for article published in Monatshefte für Chemie - Chemical Monthly, October 1984
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Enantioselektive Cyclopropanierung von 1,1-Diphenylethylen und Diazoessigester mit Kupfer-Katalysatoren
Published in
Monatshefte für Chemie - Chemical Monthly, October 1984
DOI 10.1007/bf00809355
Authors

Henri Brunner, Wolfgang Miehling

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 44%
Student > Master 2 22%
Researcher 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 4 44%
Chemical Engineering 2 22%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,862,539
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Monatshefte für Chemie - Chemical Monthly
#298
of 1,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,579
of 9,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Monatshefte für Chemie - Chemical Monthly
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,161 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.