↓ Skip to main content

Adaptive echolocation sounds in the batRhinopoma hardwickei

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, December 1981
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Adaptive echolocation sounds in the batRhinopoma hardwickei
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, December 1981
DOI 10.1007/bf01326841
Authors

Joerg Habersetzer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
Malaysia 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Israel 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 55 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Other 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 49%
Environmental Science 10 16%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 13 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,856,604
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#468
of 1,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,497
of 31,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#7
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.