↓ Skip to main content

Arboreal habitat structure affects route choice by rat snakes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Arboreal habitat structure affects route choice by rat snakes
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00359-010-0593-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel H. Mansfield, Bruce C. Jayne

Abstract

In arboreal habitats gaps between branches and branch structure profoundly affect the ability of animals to move; hence, an ability to perceive such attributes could facilitate choosing routes that enhance the speed and ease of locomotion. Although many snakes are arboreal, no previous study has determined whether they can perceive structural variation of branches that is mechanically relevant to their locomotion. We tested whether the gap distance, location, and attributes of two destination perches on the far side of a crossable gap affected the route travelled by North American rat snakes (Pantherophis), which are proficient climbers. Snakes usually chose routes with shorter gaps. Within a horizontal plane, the snakes usually went straight rather than crossing an equal distance gap with a 90° turn, which was consistent with our finding that crossing a straight gap was easier. However, decreasing the distance of the gap with a 90° turn eliminated the preference for going straight. Additional factors, such as the width of the landing surface and the complexity of branching of the destination perches, resulted in non-random route choice. Thus, many of the observed biases in route choice suggested abilities to perceive structural variation and select routes that are mechanically beneficial.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 27%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 35%
Engineering 8 31%
Environmental Science 6 23%
Computer Science 1 4%
Unknown 2 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,856,604
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#468
of 1,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,489
of 101,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.