↓ Skip to main content

High-throughput analysis of satellite DNA in the grasshopper Pyrgomorpha conica reveals abundance of homologous and heterologous higher-order repeats

Overview of attention for article published in Chromosoma, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
High-throughput analysis of satellite DNA in the grasshopper Pyrgomorpha conica reveals abundance of homologous and heterologous higher-order repeats
Published in
Chromosoma, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00412-018-0666-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francisco J. Ruiz-Ruano, Jesús Castillo-Martínez, Josefa Cabrero, Ricardo Gómez, Juan Pedro M. Camacho, María Dolores López-León

Abstract

Satellite DNA (satDNA) constitutes an important fraction of repetitive DNA in eukaryotic genomes, but it is barely known in most species. The high-throughput analysis of satDNA in the grasshopper Pyrgomorpha conica revealed 87 satDNA variants grouped into 76 different families, representing 9.4% of the genome. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of the 38 most abundant satDNA families revealed four different patterns of chromosome distribution. Homology search between the 76 satDNA families showed the existence of 15 superfamilies, each including two or more families, with the most abundant superfamily representing more than 80% of all satDNA found in this species. This also revealed the presence of two types of higher-order repeats (HORs), one showing internal homologous subrepeats, as conventional HORs, and an additional type showing non-homologous internal subrepeats, the latter arising by the combination of a given satDNA family with a non-annotated sequence, or with telomeric DNA. Interestingly, the heterologous subrepeats included in these HORs showed higher divergence within the HOR than outside it, suggesting that heterologous HORs show poor homogenization, in high contrast with conventional (homologous) HORs. Finally, heterologous HORs can show high differences in divergence between their constituent subrepeats, suggesting the possibility of regional homogenization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 20%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Professor 4 8%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 13 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 22%
Philosophy 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Unknown 16 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,976,980
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Chromosoma
#168
of 761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,076
of 333,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chromosoma
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 761 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.