↓ Skip to main content

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in Polish children - its variants and associations with HLA

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in Polish children - its variants and associations with HLA
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, September 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00467-006-0271-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aleksandra Krasowska-Kwiecień, Krystyna Sancewicz-Pach, Anna Moczulska

Abstract

HLA-DR and HLA-DQ antigens were investigated in 127 Polish children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) followed-up for the median time of 11 years (minimum 7 years). HLA typing was performed using the polymerase chain reaction sequence-specific oligonucleotide probing technique and the microlymphocytotoxicity test. Histopathologic INS categories and a response to therapy were analyzed according to particular HLA associations. The results were compared with 330 healthy individuals. In INS children, we observed an increased frequency of HLA-DR7, DR3/7, DQ2 and DQ8, whereas HLA-DR13, DR15, DQ5 and DQ6 were decreased. In minimal change nephrotic syndrome, a relationship with HLA-DR3, DR7, DR3/7 and DQ2 was found. Evolved from minimal changes, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis was associated with HLA-DR7, while primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis with HLA-DR4 and DQ8. In steroid-dependence and secondary steroid-resistance, an increased frequency of HLA-DR3, DR7, DR3/7 and DQ2 was documented. In contrast, primary steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome was associated with HLA-DR4 and DQ8. Steroid-dependent patients bearing HLA-DR3 achieved longer remissions after chlorambucil therapy compared with HLA-DR3-negative. In steroid-resistant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, a reduced response to cyclosporine A was associated with HLA-DR4. Associations with HLA differentiate between pathoanatomic entities of INS and may influence a response to immunosuppressive therapy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Lecturer 1 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 43%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2007.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#1,857
of 4,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,602
of 88,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.