↓ Skip to main content

Cardiomyopathy in Multiple Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Cardiology, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Cardiomyopathy in Multiple Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology, October 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00246-007-9119-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohit Singla, Grace Guzman, Andrew J. Griffin, Saroja Bharati

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 20%
Researcher 5 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Other 3 12%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Cardiology
#275
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,292
of 71,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Cardiology
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.