↓ Skip to main content

A revision of the genus Gmelina (Lamiaceae)

Overview of attention for article published in Kew Bulletin, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
A revision of the genus Gmelina (Lamiaceae)
Published in
Kew Bulletin, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12225-012-9382-4
Authors

Rogier de Kok

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 15%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 30%
Environmental Science 3 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 10%
Engineering 2 10%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,755,938
of 23,575,882 outputs
Outputs from Kew Bulletin
#264
of 1,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,784
of 165,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kew Bulletin
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,575,882 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,110 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them