↓ Skip to main content

The impact of commercial harvesting on Warburgia salutaris (‘pepper-bark tree’) in Mpumalanga, South Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, August 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
The impact of commercial harvesting on Warburgia salutaris (‘pepper-bark tree’) in Mpumalanga, South Africa
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, August 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:bioc.0000029333.72945.b0
Authors

J. Botha, E.T.F. Witkowski, C.M. Shackleton

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 93 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 19%
Student > Master 16 16%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 6 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 17 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 36%
Environmental Science 26 26%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 21 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,179
of 2,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,552
of 61,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.