Title |
Improving our science: the evolution of butterfly sampling and surveying methods over time
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Insect Conservation, February 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10841-018-0046-z |
Authors |
Katherine Kral, Jason Harmon, Ryan Limb, Torre Hovick |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 19 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 17% |
Researcher | 12 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Other | 17 | 16% |
Unknown | 21 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 43% |
Environmental Science | 21 | 20% |
Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Unknown | 26 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2018.
All research outputs
#15,495,840
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Insect Conservation
#489
of 665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,784
of 438,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Insect Conservation
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.