↓ Skip to main content

Bahig virus (Tete group) in naturally- and transovarially-infectedHyalomma marginatum ticks from Egypt and Italy

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Virology, March 1974
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Bahig virus (Tete group) in naturally- and transovarially-infectedHyalomma marginatum ticks from Egypt and Italy
Published in
Archives of Virology, March 1974
DOI 10.1007/bf01240201
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. D. Converse, H. Hoogstraal, M. I. Moussa, M. Stek, M. N. Kaiser

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Other 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 6 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 13%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Unknown 6 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2017.
All research outputs
#8,515,480
of 25,388,229 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#1,031
of 4,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#884
of 3,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,229 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,485 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them