↓ Skip to main content

Multiple receivers, multiple ornaments, and a trade-off between agonistic and epigamic signaling in a widowbird.

Overview of attention for article published in The American Naturalist, November 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
236 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multiple receivers, multiple ornaments, and a trade-off between agonistic and epigamic signaling in a widowbird.
Published in
The American Naturalist, November 2002
DOI 10.1086/342817
Pubmed ID
Authors

Staffan Andersson, Sarah R Pryke, Jonas Ornborg, Michael J Lawes, Malte Andersson

Abstract

Sexual displays often involve several different ornamental traits. Yet most indicator models of sexual selection based on a single receiver (usually a choosy female) find that multiple handicap signals should be unstable. Here we study reasons for this contradiction, analyzing signal function, signal content, and trade-offs between signals in the polygynous red-collared widowbird Euplectes ardens. Males have both a long, graduated tail and a red carotenoid collar badge. Territory-holding "residents" have slightly shorter tails than the nonbreeding "floaters," but their carotenoid collars are 40% larger, and they have (on the basis of reflectance spectrometry and objective colorimetry) a 23-nm more long-wave ("redder") hue than floaters. This corroborates experimental evidence that the red collar is selected by male contest competition, whereas female choice is based almost exclusively on male tail length. Tail length is negatively correlated with the carotenoid signal, which together with body size and condition explains 55% of the variation in tail length. The trade-off in tail length and carotenoid investment is steeper among residents, suggesting an interaction with costs of territory defense. We propose that the "multiple receiver hypothesis" can explain the coexistence of multiple handicap signals. Furthermore, the trade-off between signal expressions might contribute to the inverse relation between nuptial tail elongation and coloration in the genus Euplectes (bishops and widowbirds).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 250 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 26%
Researcher 46 17%
Student > Bachelor 32 12%
Student > Master 30 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 6%
Other 50 19%
Unknown 24 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 201 75%
Environmental Science 12 4%
Psychology 6 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Social Sciences 3 1%
Other 8 3%
Unknown 34 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,414,160
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from The American Naturalist
#1,893
of 3,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,572
of 49,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The American Naturalist
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.