↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of combination gene therapy with PTEN and antisense hTERT for malignant glioma in vitro and xenografts

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of combination gene therapy with PTEN and antisense hTERT for malignant glioma in vitro and xenografts
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, February 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00018-007-6424-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yongping You, Xiaozeng Geng, Peng Zhao, Zhen Fu, Cunzu Wang, Shengwu Chao, Ning Liu, Ailing Lu, Kevin Gardner, Peiyu Pu, Chunsheng Kong, Yun Ge, Susan I. V. Judge, Qingdi Q. Li

Abstract

Telomerase activation is a critical event in cell immortalization, and an increase in human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) expression is the key step in activating telomerase. The phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) gene encodes a double-specific phosphatase that induces cell cycle arrest, inhibits cell growth, and causes apoptotic cell death. Here, we evaluated a combined PTEN and antisense hTERT gene therapy for experimental glioma in vitro and in vivo. We demonstrated that infection with antisense-hTERT and wild-type-PTEN adenoviruses significantly inhibited human U251 glioma cell proliferation in vitro and glioma growth in a xenograft mouse model. The efficacy of therapy was obviously higher in the tumor xenografts infected with both PTEN and antisense hTERT than in the gliomas infected with either agent alone at the same total viral dose. Consistent with these results, we showed that telomerase activity and hTERT protein levels were markedly reduced in the glioma cells following adenovirus infection. In contrast, the levels of PTEN protein expression were dramatically increased in these cells. Our data indicate that combination treatment with antisense hTERT and wild-type PTEN effectively suppresses the malignant growth of human glioma cells in vitro and in tumor xenografts, suggesting a promising new approach in glioma gene therapy that warrants further investigation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Professor 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 8 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Unspecified 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,845,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#1,655
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,191
of 78,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#22
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.