↓ Skip to main content

Chemical Synthesis and Structure of the Prokineticin Bv8

Overview of attention for article published in ChemBioChem, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chemical Synthesis and Structure of the Prokineticin Bv8
Published in
ChemBioChem, August 2010
DOI 10.1002/cbic.201000330
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rodrigo A. V. Morales, Norelle L. Daly, Irina Vetter, Mehdi Mobli, Ian A. Napier, David J. Craik, Richard J. Lewis, MacDonald J. Christie, Glenn F. King, Paul F. Alewood, Thomas Durek

Abstract

Bv8, a 77-residue protein isolated from frogs, is the prototypic member of the prokineticin family of cytokines. Prokineticins (PKs) have only recently been identified in vertebrates (including humans), and they are believed to be involved in a number of key physiological processes, such as angiogenesis, neurogenesis, nociception, and tissue development. We used a combination of Boc solid-phase peptide synthesis, native chemical ligation, and in vitro protein folding to establish robust chemical access to this molecule. Synthetic Bv8 was obtained in good yield and exhibited full activity in a human neuroblastoma cell line and rat dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons. The 3D structure of the synthetic protein was determined by using NMR spectroscopy and it was found to be homologous with that of mamba intestinal toxin 1, which is the only other known prokineticin structure. Analysis of a truncated mutant lacking five residues at the N terminus that are critical for receptor binding and activation showed no perturbation to the core protein structure. Together with the functional data, this suggests that receptor binding is likely to be a highly cooperative process possibly involving major allosterically driven structural rearrangements. The facile and efficient synthesis presented here will enable preparation of unique chemical analogues of prokineticins, which should be powerful tools for modulating the structure and function of prokineticins and their receptors, and studying the many physiological processes that have been linked to them.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Australia 1 4%
Unknown 24 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Professor 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 10 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Materials Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,251,042
of 24,712,008 outputs
Outputs from ChemBioChem
#2,112
of 5,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,065
of 98,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ChemBioChem
#15
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,712,008 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,959 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.