↓ Skip to main content

Am improved source mechanism for the 1935 Timiskaming, Quebec earthquake from regional waveforms

Overview of attention for article published in Pure and Applied Geophysics, February 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Am improved source mechanism for the 1935 Timiskaming, Quebec earthquake from regional waveforms
Published in
Pure and Applied Geophysics, February 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf00876667
Authors

Allison L. Bent

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 30%
Researcher 3 30%
Professor 1 10%
Unspecified 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 70%
Environmental Science 1 10%
Unspecified 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,845,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Pure and Applied Geophysics
#188
of 744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,549
of 81,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pure and Applied Geophysics
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.