↓ Skip to main content

Rapid alterations to marine microbiota communities following an oil spill

Overview of attention for article published in Ecotoxicology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Rapid alterations to marine microbiota communities following an oil spill
Published in
Ecotoxicology, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10646-018-1923-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brad J. Gemmell, Hernando P. Bacosa, Ben O. Dickey, Colbi G. Gemmell, Lama R. Alqasemi, Edward J. Buskey

Abstract

Field data from the first several days after an oil spill is rare but crucial for our understanding of a spill's impact on marine microbiota given their short generation times. Field data collected within days of the Texas City "Y" oil spill showed that exposure to crude oil can rapidly imbalance populations of marine microbiota, which leads to the proliferation of more resistant organisms. Vibrionales bacteria were up to 48 times higher than background concentrations at the most impacted sites and populations of the dinoflagellate Prorocentrum texanum increased significantly as well. Laboratory microcosm experiments with a natural plankton community showed that P. texanum grew significantly faster under oiled conditions but monocultures of P. texanum did not. Additional laboratory experiments with natural communities from Tampa Bay, Florida showed similar results although a different species dominated, P. minimum. In both cases, tolerance to the presence of crude oil was enhanced by higher sensitivity of grazers led to a release from grazing pressure and allows Prorocentrum species to dominate after an oil spill. The results suggest careful monitoring for Vibrionales and Prorocentrum during future spills would be beneficial given the potential implications to human health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 25%
Student > Bachelor 8 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Master 3 7%
Professor 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 12 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 11 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 14 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,779,732
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Ecotoxicology
#115
of 1,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,092
of 332,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecotoxicology
#3
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,481 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.