| Title |
The 2R hypothesis and the human genome sequence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics, March 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1022661917301 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karsten Hokamp, Aoife McLysaght, Kenneth H. Wolfe |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Israel | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 8 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 57% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 10 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2014.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics
#27
of 104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,141
of 62,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.