| Title |
Molecular basis for glucose-galactose malabsorption
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, January 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1385/cbb:36:2-3:115 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ernest M. Wright, Eric Turk, Martin G. Martin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 28% |
| Researcher | 10 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2019.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics
#73
of 1,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,778
of 130,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,017 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them