| Title |
Small is beautiful: In defense of the small-N design
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Springer Nature, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3758/s13423-018-1451-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philip L. Smith, Daniel R. Little |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 527 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 97 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 80 | 15% |
| Australia | 29 | 6% |
| Japan | 27 | 5% |
| Canada | 20 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 17 | 3% |
| Germany | 16 | 3% |
| Spain | 14 | 3% |
| France | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 61 | 12% |
| Unknown | 158 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 286 | 54% |
| Scientists | 215 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 649 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 649 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 161 | 25% |
| Researcher | 118 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 73 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 7% |
| Professor | 34 | 5% |
| Other | 112 | 17% |
| Unknown | 106 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 251 | 39% |
| Neuroscience | 72 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 2% |
| Other | 87 | 13% |
| Unknown | 177 | 27% |