| Title |
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis The TOPAS-TAVI Registry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.01.054 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Henrique Barbosa Ribeiro, Stamatios Lerakis, Martine Gilard, João L. Cavalcante, Raj Makkar, Howard C. Herrmann, Stephan Windecker, Maurice Enriquez-Sarano, Asim N. Cheema, Luis Nombela-Franco, Ignacio Amat-Santos, Antonio J. Muñoz-García, Bruno Garcia del Blanco, Alan Zajarias, John C. Lisko, Salim Hayek, Vasilis Babaliaros, Florent Le Ven, Thomas G. Gleason, Tarun Chakravarty, Wilson Y. Szeto, Marie-Annick Clavel, Alberto de Agustin, Vicenç Serra, John T. Schindler, Abdellaziz Dahou, Rishi Puri, Emilie Pelletier-Beaumont, Melanie Côté, Philippe Pibarot, Josep Rodés-Cabau |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 223 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 52 | 23% |
| Spain | 14 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 6% |
| Mexico | 10 | 4% |
| Colombia | 6 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 6 | 3% |
| Brazil | 6 | 3% |
| Chile | 3 | 1% |
| Argentina | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 38 | 17% |
| Unknown | 71 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 151 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 38 | 17% |
| Scientists | 24 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 180 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 16% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 21% |
| Unknown | 58 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 86 | 48% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 70 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 144. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2021.
All research outputs
#290,526
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#659
of 17,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,577
of 347,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#18
of 414 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 414 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.