↓ Skip to main content

Maternal Genes and Facial Clefts in Offspring: A Comprehensive Search for Genetic Associations in Two Population-Based Cleft Studies from Scandinavia

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Maternal Genes and Facial Clefts in Offspring: A Comprehensive Search for Genetic Associations in Two Population-Based Cleft Studies from Scandinavia
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0011493
Pubmed ID
Authors

Astanand Jugessur, Min Shi, Håkon Kristian Gjessing, Rolv Terje Lie, Allen James Wilcox, Clarice Ring Weinberg, Kaare Christensen, Abee Lowman Boyles, Sandra Daack-Hirsch, Truc Trung Nguyen, Lene Christiansen, Andrew Carl Lidral, Jeffrey Clark Murray

Abstract

Fetal conditions can in principle be affected by the mother's genotype working through the prenatal environment.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Japan 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 61 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 17%
Psychology 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#88,762
of 194,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,746
of 94,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#397
of 719 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,524 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 719 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.