↓ Skip to main content

Revitalizing an Existing Honor Code Program

Overview of attention for article published in Innovative Higher Education, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Revitalizing an Existing Honor Code Program
Published in
Innovative Higher Education, August 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10755-007-9048-6
Authors

Pauline Melgoza, Jane Smith

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Lecturer 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 9 38%
Arts and Humanities 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 8%
Psychology 2 8%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2009.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Innovative Higher Education
#186
of 420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,427
of 67,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Innovative Higher Education
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them