| Title |
Transfer-appropriate processing (TAP)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Memory & Cognition, October 2000
|
| DOI | 10.3758/bf03211815 |
| Authors |
Jeffery J. Franks, Carol W. Bilbrey, Khoo Guat Lien, Timothy P. McNamara |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 18 | 29% |
| Unknown | 9 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 35 | 56% |
| Linguistics | 4 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2012.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#491
of 1,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,355
of 37,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 37,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.