| Title |
Salinity and sodicity effects on respiration and microbial biomass of soil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology and Fertility of Soils, April 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00374-008-0279-1 |
| Authors |
Vanessa N. L. Wong, Ram C. Dalal, Richard S. B. Greene |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 141 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 15% |
| Researcher | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 18% |
| Unknown | 27 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 31 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 11% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 32 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,856,604
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Biology and Fertility of Soils
#210
of 578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,280
of 83,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology and Fertility of Soils
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them