↓ Skip to main content

A robust orthogonal algorithm for system identification and time-series analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Cybernetics, February 1989
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
A robust orthogonal algorithm for system identification and time-series analysis
Published in
Biological Cybernetics, February 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf00204124
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. J. Korenberg

Abstract

We describe and illustrate methods for obtaining a parsimonious sinusoidal series representation or model of biological time-series data. The methods are also used to identify nonlinear systems with unknown structure. A key aspect is a rapid search for significant terms to include in the model for the system or the time-series. For example, the methods use fast and robust orthogonal searches for significant frequencies in the time-series, and differ from conventional Fourier series analysis in several important respects. In particular, the frequencies in our resulting sinusoidal series need not be commensurate, nor integral multiples of the fundamental frequency corresponding to the record length. Freed of these restrictions, the methods produce a more economical sinusoidal series representation (than a Fourier series), finding the most significant frequencies first, and automatically determine model order. The methods are also capable of higher resolution than a conventional Fourier series analysis. In addition, the methods can cope with unequally-spaced or missing data, and are applicable to time-series corrupted by noise. Finally, we compare one of our methods with a well-known technique for resolving sinusoidal signals in noise using published data for the test time-series.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Netherlands 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 42 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 25%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 28 55%
Physics and Astronomy 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 6 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,272,274
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#51
of 675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,776
of 53,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 675 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them