↓ Skip to main content

Brain Mapping as a Tool to Study Neurodegeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Neurotherapeutics, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Brain Mapping as a Tool to Study Neurodegeneration
Published in
Neurotherapeutics, July 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.nurt.2007.05.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liana G. Apostolova, Paul M. Thompson

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disorder for those 65 years or older; it currently affects 4.5 million in the United States and is predicted to rise to 13.2 million by the year 2050. Neuroimaging and brain mapping techniques offer extraordinary power to understand AD, providing spatially detailed information on the extent and trajectory of the disease as it spreads in the living brain. Computational anatomy techniques, applied to large databases of brain MRI scans, reveal the dynamic sequence of cortical and hippocampal changes with disease progression and how these relate to cognitive decline and future clinical outcomes. People who are mildly cognitively impaired, in particular, are at a fivefold increased risk of imminent conversion to dementia, and they show specific structural brain changes that are predictive of imminent disease onset. We review the principles and key findings of several new methods for assessing brain degeneration, including voxel-based morphometry, tensor-based morphometry, cortical thickness mapping, hippocampal atrophy mapping, and automated methods for mapping ventricular anatomy. Applications to AD and other dementias are discussed, with a brief review of related findings in other neurological and neuropsychiatric illnesses, including epilepsy, HIV/AIDS, schizophrenia, and disorders of brain development.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Germany 3 2%
Spain 3 2%
Netherlands 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 145 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 17%
Student > Master 26 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 7%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 26 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 25%
Psychology 22 14%
Neuroscience 18 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 11%
Computer Science 6 4%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 32 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2021.
All research outputs
#3,418,699
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Neurotherapeutics
#344
of 1,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,308
of 78,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurotherapeutics
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.