| Title |
Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-009-1588-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kevin M. Kelly, Judy Dean, W. Scott Comulada, Sung-Jae Lee |
| Abstract |
Mammography, the standard method of breast cancer screening, misses many cancers, especially in dense-breasted women. We compared the performance and diagnostic yield of mammography alone versus an automated whole breast ultrasound (AWBU) plus mammography in women with dense breasts and/or at elevated risk of breast cancer. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 360 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 349 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 54 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 15% |
| Researcher | 44 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 58 | 16% |
| Unknown | 76 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 91 | 25% |
| Engineering | 65 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 31 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 50 | 14% |
| Unknown | 88 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#729,298
of 23,905,714 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#33
of 4,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,754
of 93,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,905,714 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,401 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.