↓ Skip to main content

Early Recovery and Functional Outcome are Related with Causal Stroke Subtype: Data from the Tinzaparin in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early Recovery and Functional Outcome are Related with Causal Stroke Subtype: Data from the Tinzaparin in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trial
Published in
Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases, July 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2007.02.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nikola Sprigg, Laura J. Gray, Philip M.W. Bath, Ewa Lindenstrøm, Gudrun Boysen, Peter Paul De Deyn, Pal Friis, Didier Leys, Reijo Marttila, Jan-Edwin Olsson, Desmond O’Neill, Erich Bernd Ringelstein, Jan-Jacob van der Sande, Alexander G.G. Turpie, TAIST Investigators

Abstract

Baseline severity and causal subtype are predictors of outcome in ischemic stroke. We used data from the Tinzaparin in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trial (TAIST) to further assess the relationship among stroke subtype, early recovery, and outcome.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 17%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2022.
All research outputs
#8,572,103
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases
#1,014
of 2,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,518
of 78,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them