↓ Skip to main content

Rat-bite fever septic arthritis: illustrative case and literature review

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Rat-bite fever septic arthritis: illustrative case and literature review
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, November 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10096-006-0224-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Dendle, I. J. Woolley, T. M. Korman

Abstract

Rat-bite fever is a rare zoonotic infection caused by Streptobacillus moniliformis or Spirillum minus, which is characterised by fever, rash and arthritis. The arthritis has previously been described as non-suppurative and isolation of the organism from synovial fluid as very uncommon. This article reports a case of septic arthritis diagnosed as rat-bite fever when the organism was cultured from synovial fluid and reviews another 15 cases of S. moniliformis septic arthritis reported in the worldwide literature since 1985. Articles were included in this review if S. moniliformis was cultured from synovial fluid. Of the published cases, 88% presented with polyarthritis, affecting small and large joints although two had monoarticular hip sepsis. Fever was present in 88%, rash in 25% and 56% had extra-articular features. Synovial fluid analysis revealed high cell counts in all cases (mean 51,000 x 10(9)/l) with a predominance of polymorphonuclear leucocytes, and organisms were found on Gram stain in only 50%. Penicillin was used for treatment in 56% of cases and surgery was required in 30%. All patients recovered. Rat-bite fever arthritis can be suppurative and attempts should be made to isolate the organism from synovial fluid. The diagnosis should be considered when there is arthritis and a high synovial fluid cell count but no apparent organism, especially when the patient has had contact with rats.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 21%
Other 5 21%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Unknown 8 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2018.
All research outputs
#4,696,396
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#418
of 2,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,567
of 69,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.