↓ Skip to main content

Engineering a Reduced Escherichia coli Genome

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Research, April 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
34 patents
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
246 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
259 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Engineering a Reduced Escherichia coli Genome
Published in
Genome Research, April 2002
DOI 10.1101/gr.217202
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vitaliy Kolisnychenko, Guy Plunkett, Christopher D Herring, Tamás Fehér, János Pósfai, Frederick R Blattner, György Pósfai

Abstract

Our goal is to construct an improved Escherichia coli to serve both as a better model organism and as a more useful technological tool for genome science. We developed techniques for precise genomic surgery and applied them to deleting the largest K-islands of E. coli, identified by comparative genomics as recent horizontal acquisitions to the genome. They are loaded with cryptic prophages, transposons, damaged genes, and genes of unknown function. Our method leaves no scars or markers behind and can be applied sequentially. Twelve K-islands were successfully deleted, resulting in an 8.1% reduced genome size, a 9.3% reduction of gene count, and elimination of 24 of the 44 transposable elements of E. coli. These are particularly detrimental because they can mutagenize the genome or transpose into clones being propagated for sequencing, as happened in 18 places of the draft human genome sequence. We found no change in the growth rate on minimal medium, confirming the nonessential nature of these islands. This demonstration of feasibility opens the way for constructing a maximally reduced strain, which will provide a clean background for functional genomics studies, a more efficient background for use in biotechnology applications, and a unique tool for studies of genome stability and evolution.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
Brazil 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 237 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 25%
Researcher 52 20%
Student > Master 30 12%
Student > Bachelor 28 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 39 15%
Unknown 33 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 113 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 69 27%
Engineering 7 3%
Chemical Engineering 5 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Other 19 7%
Unknown 42 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,907,044
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Genome Research
#1,806
of 4,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,767
of 130,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Research
#6
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.