↓ Skip to main content

Effect of nitric oxide on lymphocytes from sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients: toxic or protective role?

Overview of attention for article published in Neurological Sciences, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Effect of nitric oxide on lymphocytes from sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients: toxic or protective role?
Published in
Neurological Sciences, November 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10072-006-0702-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Cereda, E. Cova, C. Di Poto, A. Galli, G. Mazzini, M. Corato, M. Ceroni

Abstract

Markers of oxidative and nitrosative stress have been found in spinal cord, cortex, cerebrospinal fluid and plasma of patients affected by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a fatal disorder characterised by progressive motor neuron degeneration. In this study, we investigated the effect of the NO-releasing agent, diethylamine NONOate (NONO), on lymphocytes from patients affected by the sporadic form of ALS (SALS) and controls by flow cytometry. In the same experimental conditions we investigated the expression of the antioxidant proteins, Bcl-2 and SOD1. Incubation with NONO induced cell damage in control lymphocytes but did not further damage the already affected untreated SALS lymphocytes. The incubation with NONO induced a time-dependent decrease of Bcl-2 and SOD1 in control lymphocytes. Surprisingly, in SALS lymphocytes the NONO treatment increased the expression of these proteins, which in basal conditions was depressed compared to control lymphocytes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 24%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 5 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Psychology 2 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 19%