↓ Skip to main content

Amlexanox for the Treatment of Recurrent Aphthous Ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Drug Investigation, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Amlexanox for the Treatment of Recurrent Aphthous Ulcers
Published in
Clinical Drug Investigation, August 2012
DOI 10.2165/00044011-200525090-00001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliette Bell

Abstract

Recurrent aphthous ulcer (RAU) is the most prevalent oral mucosal disease in humans, estimated to affect between 5% and 50% of the general population. The minor manifestation of the condition is the most common and is characterised by small, shallow, round or oval lesions that are surrounded by a raised erythematous halo and are covered by a grey-white pseudomembrane. Appropriate management of patients with this condition is largely symptomatic and should focus on reducing ulcer duration, relieving pain and reducing or preventing ulcer recurrence. Amlexanox is a novel anti-inflammatory and anti-allergic agent that has been evaluated for the treatment of RAU in a series of robust clinical trials. After a 100mg dose of 5% amlexanox topical paste, applied directly to the lesion, the maximum serum concentration of the drug was 120 ng/mL, which was achieved 2.4 hours after application. Steady-state concentrations were achieved within 1 week of starting four times daily dosing and there was no evidence of accumulation. In terms of efficacy, application of 5% amlexanox topical paste was shown to consistently and significantly accelerate complete ulcer healing and the time to resolution of pain across four large efficacy studies. Significantly more patients had completely healed ulcers from day 3 (compared with no treatment) and day 4 (compared with vehicle). Healing was mirrored by an improvement in pain: significantly more patients had complete resolution of pain from day 2 (compared with no treatment) and day 3 (compared with vehicle). Overall, amlexanox was well tolerated, with a low frequency of adverse effects. In the oral application studies, adverse effects that were considered by investigators to be potentially related to the study treatment occurred in 2.4% and 2.1% of 5% amlexanox and vehicle recipients, respectively. These effects were mainly local and were all classed as mild to moderate in severity, with the exception of one case of severe stinging in the vehicle treatment group. Furthermore, the incidence of dermal irritation and sensitisation was very low with amlexanox. These findings suggest that 5% amlexanox topical paste is a useful and well tolerated therapeutic option for the treatment of RAU.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 20%
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Other 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 14 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 17%
Chemistry 5 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 14 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Drug Investigation
#318
of 1,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,269
of 187,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Drug Investigation
#94
of 344 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 344 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.