| Title |
Technik und Nutzen des multimodalen intraoperativen Neuromonitorings bei komplexen Wirbelsäuleneingriffen älterer Patienten
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Die Orthopädie, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00132-018-3538-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Campos-Friz, U. Hubbe |
| Abstract |
Complex spinal surgery in elderly patients mostly treats degenerative spine alterations. The use of multimodal intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) has proven to be a useful tool to recognize neural deterioration during such operations. Elderly patients often have preexisting neural impairment, which leads to difficulties in deriving some potentials or can even lead to not obtaining any potentials at all. For reliable benefits from IONM a combined use of monitoring and mapping methods as well as the right choice of methods according to the spine level to be treated and a definition of the neural structures in danger is needed. This article intends to explain IONM methods in procedures treating degenerative spine alterations in a comprehensive way and to show our point of view on pedicle stimulation. Readers should be motivated to deepen their knowledge in these methods and to gain confidence and experience to increase the safety of these operations for the benefit of our patients. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 60% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Die Orthopädie
#276
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,057
of 351,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Orthopädie
#9
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.